On 10/01/2018 04:07 PM, Laine Stump wrote: > Commit 3836a38c added a $secret-undefine call at the end of > 100-disk-encryption.t because the presence of the secret was > reportedly causing an error when the test was run a 2nd > time. Unfortunately the definition of "my $secret" was inside a SKIP: > { ... } block, but the $secret->undefine was added just outside that > block, so the test failed when it was run. > > Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > > NB: this test is disabled unconditionally at the start of the SKIP > block anyway, so I'm not sure how Jim encountered the error leading to > the original patch. > > scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t b/scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t > index 1a36650..12386ae 100644 > --- a/scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t > +++ b/scripts/qemu/100-disk-encryption.t > @@ -117,6 +117,6 @@ diag "Undefining the inactive domain config"; > $dom->undefine; > > ok_error(sub { $conn->get_domain_by_name("tck") }, "NO_DOMAIN error raised from missing domain", 42); > -} > > $secret->undefine; > +} Reviewed-by: Yash Mankad <ymankad@xxxxxxxxxx> -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list