Re: [PATCH 0/2] tests: Add QEMU 3.0.0 capability tests for s390x

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 09/21/2018 01:13 AM, Bjoern Walk wrote:
> John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> [2018-09-20, 04:30PM -0400]:
>>
>>
>> On 09/20/2018 06:20 AM, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
>>> Add capability and domcaps tests for QEMU 3.0.0 on s390x.
>>>
>>> Boris Fiuczynski (2):
>>>   tests: Add capabilities data for QEMU 3.0.0 on s390x
>>>   tests: domaincaps: Add QEMU 3.0 for s390x
>>>
>>>  .../domaincapsschemadata/qemu_3.0.0.s390x.xml |   183 +
>>>  tests/domaincapstest.c                        |     4 +
>>>  .../caps_3.0.0.s390x.replies                  | 20530 ++++++++++++++++
>>>  .../qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_3.0.0.s390x.xml |  2691 ++
>>>  tests/qemucapabilitiestest.c                  |     1 +
>>>  5 files changed, 23409 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 tests/domaincapsschemadata/qemu_3.0.0.s390x.xml
>>>  create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_3.0.0.s390x.replies
>>>  create mode 100644 tests/qemucapabilitiesdata/caps_3.0.0.s390x.xml
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> (series)
>>
>> and pushed,
> 
> Thanks, but just for interest, tracking Reviewed-by and other tags is a
> thing in libvirt or not?
> 

<face-palm> - totally forgot to do that on this series - my apologies...
I still haven't succumbed to figuring out a way to make the R-B add
happen automagically.... And our hook only cares to see the S-O-B.

To answer the question - there's no "official" tracking. Some people
still use ACK while others use R-By. It was hard enough to jump the
hurdle for S-O-B.

John

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux