On 09/19/2018 05:50 PM, Erik Skultety wrote: > On Wed, Sep 19, 2018 at 05:42:18PM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> On 09/19/2018 12:22 PM, Erik Skultety wrote: >>> All of the ones being removed are pulled in by internal.h. The only >>> exception is sanlock which expects the application to include <stdint.h> >>> before sanlock's headers, because sanlock prototypes use fixed width >>> int, but they don't include stdint.h themselves, so we have to leave >>> that one in place. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >> >> Is there an automated way to verify this? I don't expect anybody going >> one file after another just to see if this is correct. > > That would be madness. In fact what I did after sed'ing this was trying to > compile it until it passed. > >> >> I think the fact that this would pass travis/jenkins could be enough. >> But there has to be a better way. > > That's in fact what I did, I built the repo on ubuntu-18, centos-7, fedora-28, > rawhide, freebsd-11. I also verified with mingw and Clang. > Well, this sounds reasonable. What I am worried about is that some functions might require more than one header files (e.g. open(2)). And even though everything is working for me if I include only one of them, compilation might not work on say mingw because all three header files are required there. However, given that we improved jenkinks, I'd say lets rely on it in this case and merge these patches. ACK to both. Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
