在 2018/9/11 下午10:31, Andrea Bolognani 写道:
On Tue, 2018-09-04 at 16:39 +0800, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
[...]
+char *
+qemuBuildZPCIDevStr(virDomainDeviceInfoPtr dev)
+{
+ virBuffer buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER;
+
+ virBufferAddLit(&buf, "zpci");
+ virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",uid=%u", dev->addr.pci.zpci.uid);
+ virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",fid=%u", dev->addr.pci.zpci.fid);
+ virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",target=%s", dev->alias);
+ virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",id=zpci%u", dev->addr.pci.zpci.uid);
All of the above can be a single virBufferAsprintf() call.
Sure.
[...]
+static int
+qemuAppendZPCIDevStr(virCommandPtr cmd,
+ virDomainDeviceInfoPtr dev)
I'd call this qemuCommandAddZPCIDevice() or something like that.
OK.
+{
+ char *devstr = NULL;
+
+ virCommandAddArg(cmd, "-device");
Empty line here.
Yeah.
+ if (!(devstr = qemuBuildZPCIDevStr(dev)))
+ return -1;
[...]
+static int
+qemuBuildExtensionCommandLine(virCommandPtr cmd,
+ virDomainDeviceInfoPtr dev)
Same comment about the naming as above.
OK.
+{
+ if (!virZPCIDeviceAddressIsEmpty(&dev->addr.pci.zpci))
+ return qemuAppendZPCIDevStr(cmd, dev);
+
+ return 0;
I'd rather see this as
if (virZPCIDeviceAddressIsEmpty(&dev->addr.pci.zpci))
return 0;
return qemuAppendZPCIDevStr(cmd, dev);
instead.
How about using switch? I think extension flag should be check and
then build command for each case although there's only zpci case.
[...]
@@ -4327,6 +4390,9 @@ qemuBuildSoundCommandLine(virCommandPtr cmd,
if (sound->model == VIR_DOMAIN_SOUND_MODEL_PCSPK) {
virCommandAddArgList(cmd, "-soundhw", "pcspk", NULL);
} else {
+ if (qemuBuildExtensionCommandLine(cmd, &sound->info) < 0)
+ return -1;
Do the codecs (handled immediately below) require a zpci device
as well? I figure they don't, but I also don't know much about
sound devices :)
If its address is PCI, we should add a zpci for it. zPCI is not related
to its functionality.
[...]
@@ -9086,6 +9171,9 @@ qemuBuildShmemCommandLine(virLogManagerPtr logManager,
switch ((virDomainShmemModel)shmem->model) {
case VIR_DOMAIN_SHMEM_MODEL_IVSHMEM:
+ if (qemuBuildExtensionCommandLine(cmd, &shmem->info) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
devstr = qemuBuildShmemDevLegacyStr(def, shmem, qemuCaps);
break;
@@ -9104,6 +9192,9 @@ qemuBuildShmemCommandLine(virLogManagerPtr logManager,
ATTRIBUTE_FALLTHROUGH;
case VIR_DOMAIN_SHMEM_MODEL_IVSHMEM_DOORBELL:
+ if (qemuBuildExtensionCommandLine(cmd, &shmem->info) < 0)
+ return -1;
+
devstr = qemuBuildShmemDevStr(def, shmem, qemuCaps);
break;
This looks wrong: you should call qemuBuildExtensionCommandLine()
later on, like
if (!devstr)
return -1;
if (qemuBuildExtensionCommandLine(cmd, &shmem->info) < 0)
return -1;
virCommandAddArgList(cmd, "-device", devstr, NULL);
instead.
Good catch. Thanks for your comments.
--
Yi Min
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
