Hi, > > Also libvirt manages hotpluggability per device *class*, not per device > > *instance*. So a device being hotpluggable or not depending on some > > device property is a problem for libvirt ... > > > > I'm open to suggestions how to handle this better, as long as the > > libvirt people are on board with the approach. > > Ok, so we need a new class to handle making a device non-hotpluggable, > but I'm still not sure whether we should make: > > -device vfio-pci-ramfb > > or > > -device vfio-pci-nohotplug,ramfb=on > > Where ramfb would be a property only available on the nohotplug class > variant. I'm fine with the latter. > The latter seems to provide a lot more flexibility, but which > is more practical for libvirt? Any comment from the libvirt camp? thanks, Gerd -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
