On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 03:41:26PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:24:19PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:24:42PM +0200, Ján Tomko wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 02:10:55PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote: > > > > > So how about storing 2 sets of expected data for this test case. > > > > > > > > > > > Two is not enough. My clang 5.0.1 produces a test that displays the > > > monkeys correctly, but does not count their width properly: > > > > Is this a different bug though ? The issue with iswprint() is varying > > according to glibc version, not compiler version. > > > > The broken setup is: > sys-libs/glibc-2.25-r9 > sys-devel/clang-5.0.1 > > It works on: > sys-libs/glibc-2.26-r7 > with either of: > sys-devel/clang-5.0.1 > sys-devel/clang-6.0.1 > > So yes, it is a glibc bug. > Depending on the version, either just wcwidth returns incorrect values > for the monkeys (my case) or iswprint considers them non-printable. It sounds like in your case we're genuinely broken in the virsh code, not merely tests broken. I wonder if we need extra logic in the virsh code to handle escaping for the cases where wcwidth is returning wrong data, so we still get column layout correct ? > > So I wonder if the clang problem you mention is something that can be > > fixed in some way ? > > > > Nope, red herring. My maint point was that there are more than 2 > possible results. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
