在 2018/8/20 下午6:48, Andrea Bolognani 写道:
On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 16:32 +0800, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
在 2018/8/16 下午11:03, Andrea Bolognani 写道:
I haven't looked into the hash table handling in detail but I
wonder if it's really necessary? IIUC you're using it just to
mark which uids and fids have been already used by a device,
which the PCI address allocation code does by setting bits
inside integer variables - having a custom hash table for the
same seems like overkill, and from the maintenance point of
view it would be great to have the logic for PCI address and
zPCI address allocation be similar unless diverging is strictly
necessary.
PCI address set uses array to store pci addresses' assignment. It doesn't
need too much memory because the buses are allocated dynamically, one
bus only has 32 slot, and it's a tree topology. But in zpci case, fid
and uid
are flat. FID is 32-bit so that we need a 4294967295 sized array.
Don't you think it's too large?
Welp, I guess you're right. Disregard this comment then.
Thanks for your comment anyway!
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
