On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 03:51:21PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 02:34:46PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > > The code which updated the message length after writing the > > payload wrote the updated length word in the wrong place since > > the XDR object was given a buffer pointing to the start of the > > header payload, rather than message start. > > > > * daemon/remote.c: Fix updating of event message length so that > > we actually send the payload, not just the header > > ACK > Hum, but how did that work previously ? Or did it never worked ? I only broke the code fairly recently :-) Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list