On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 03:29:49PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 04:24:16PM +0200, Daniel Veillard wrote: > > I'm suggesting to try to push 0.7.2 around Fri 16 Oct, we already have > > a number of cleanup patches in and serious improvements for ESX driver. > > If we go with that plan I think patches and big changes should be pushed > > in the tree by Fri 9, this includes among other things the AppArmor > > security driver. > > I think it would be nice to get back on an end-of-the-month release > schedule. It was nice to have predictability that the date was approx > the 30/31st of the month. If we did two 5 week cycles instead of 4 > week cycles we'd be trivially aligned again, Fri 23 Oct and then > Fri 27 Nov, etc Hum, understood but I would prefer 2 releases than one big one, so what about 9/10 code freeze for 0.7.2 16/10 release of 0.7.2 23/10 code freeze for 0.7.3 30/10 release of 0.7.3 this mean a bit more churn on the releases push but I prefer than than waiting 6 weeks, I didn that the last time and IMHO that was too long. And that should not block development too much, if by the 9 some feature is not ready keep it warm until after 0.7.2, unless there is really a set of dependant changes, the intermediate week of bug fixes should not really affect productivity, right ? Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxx | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library http://libvirt.org/ -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list