Pino Toscano <ptoscano@xxxxxxxxxx> [2018-08-02, 10:02AM +0200]: > I do not think this patch is correct: we are dealing with random bytes, > so there is no "endianness" for them. Well, it's not incorrect either, isn't it? I agree that endianness doesn't matter for random data, but in the same time, it doesn't hurt to have the same random data generated on big- and little-endian machines. And it gives an easy and future-proof fix for the mocked tests.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
