在 2018/7/25 下午9:31, Andrea Bolognani 写道:
On Wed, 2018-07-25 at 16:58 +0800, Yi Min Zhao wrote:
[...]
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CONTROLLER:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_DISK:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_LEASE:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_FS:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NET:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_INPUT:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_SOUND:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_VIDEO:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_HOSTDEV:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_WATCHDOG:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_GRAPHICS:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_HUB:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_REDIRDEV:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_SMARTCARD:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_MEMBALLOON:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_NVRAM:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_RNG:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_SHMEM:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_TPM:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_PANIC:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_MEMORY:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_IOMMU:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_VSOCK:
Did you validate that all of the above can be used with zPCI?
Yes, I did. But how far can zPCI be used is a question. I make sure that
if their address
type can be PCI type zPCI address could be expanded. But we don't
guarantee they can
be really used in qemu. Like RNG device can't be used because it doesn't
support MSIx
which is required on S390.
If that's the case, I'm not sure the current solution is what we
want: if someone creates a guest and includes a RNG device in the
configuration, they probably expect it to, well, work. IIUC, with
the current implementation they would get a non-working RNG device
instead, which certainly feels suboptimal.
Actually the guest can't startup with RNG device instead of a running guest
with a non-working RNG device and qemu would report error. The user can
get the information regarding startup failure. I think this is proper.
If RNG could support MSIx in future, we won't need to do any thing in
Libvirt.
[...]
+static virDomainPCIAddressExtensionFlags
+qemuDomainDeviceCalculatePCIAddressExtensionFlags(virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps,
+ virDomainDeviceDefPtr dev)
+{
+ virDomainPCIAddressExtensionFlags extFlags = 0;
+
+ if (virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_ZPCI) &&
+ qemuDomainDeviceSupportZPCI(dev))
+ extFlags |= VIR_PCI_ADDRESS_EXTENSION_ZPCI;
The libvirt code style guidelines[1] state that this should be
formatted as
if (virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_ZPCI) &&
qemuDomainDeviceSupportZPCI(dev)) {
extFlags |= VIR_PCI_ADDRESS_EXTENSION_ZPCI;
}
[1] https://libvirt.org/hacking.html
I see a lot of code in libvirt use this style. Is it new guideline?
It's certainly been around for the past 3+ years. There's a lot of
code in libvirt that's *way* older than that, though :)
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
