On 2018年07月25日 06:02, John Ferlan wrote:
On 07/18/2018 03:57 AM, bing.niu@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Bing Niu <bing.niu@xxxxxxxxx>
Separate resctrl common information parts from CAT specific parts,
so that common information parts can be reused among different
resource allocation technologies.
Signed-off-by: Bing Niu <bing.niu@xxxxxxxxx>
---
src/util/virresctrl.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
I'm assuming you are coordinating with the [RFC PATCHv2 00/10] x86 RDT
Cache Monitoring Technology (CMT) that's on list as well. I don't have
the cycles to do any compare/contrast between the two...
Yup~ Huaqiang in cc list is working on CMT part. We already sync off
line. Since monitor is more complicated and a brand new implementing to
replace old perf based monitor functions. Huaqiang will absorb Martin's
comment and update his RFC patch. :)
diff --git a/src/util/virresctrl.c b/src/util/virresctrl.c
index 6d69c8d..98e7296 100644
--- a/src/util/virresctrl.c
+++ b/src/util/virresctrl.c
@@ -318,9 +318,8 @@ virResctrlUnlock(int fd)
/* virResctrlInfo-related definitions */
static int
-virResctrlGetInfo(virResctrlInfoPtr resctrl)
+virResctrlGetCacheInfo(virResctrlInfoPtr resctrl, DIR *dirp)
One argument per line... I can fix before pushing though.
My bad! I should remember one argument per line for function, instead of
just splitting line only beyond 80 characters. :(
Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx>
John
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
