Re: [PATCH 2/2] rpc: treat EADDRNOTAVAIL as non-fatal when listening

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 15:18:10 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> Consider creating a listener socket from a hostname that resolves to
> multiple addresses. It might be the case that the hostname resolves to
> both an IPv4 and IPv6 address because it is reachable over both
> protocols, but the IPv6 connectivity is provided off-host. In such a
> case no local NIC will have IPv6 and so bind() would fail with the
> EADDRNOTAVAIL errno. Thus it should be treated as non-fatal as long as
> at least one socket was succesfully bound.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  src/rpc/virnetsocket.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/src/rpc/virnetsocket.c b/src/rpc/virnetsocket.c
> index 8e04d61e98..044e6d8804 100644
> --- a/src/rpc/virnetsocket.c
> +++ b/src/rpc/virnetsocket.c
> @@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ int virNetSocketNewListenTCP(const char *nodename,
>  #endif
>  
>          if (bind(fd, runp->ai_addr, runp->ai_addrlen) < 0) {
> -            if (errno != EADDRINUSE) {
> +            if (errno != EADDRINUSE && errno != EADDRNOTAVAIL) {
>                  virReportSystemError(errno, "%s", _("Unable to bind to port"));
>                  goto error;
>              }

Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux