On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 08:05:39PM +0100, Paul Jenner wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 20:51 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 08:31:54PM +0100, Paul Jenner wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 13:14 +0100, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > %if %{with_python}
> > > > %package python
> > > > Summary: Python bindings for the libvirt library
> > > > Group: Development/Libraries
> > > > Requires: libvirt = %{version}-%{release}
> > >
> > > Do the python bindings really depend on the libvirt (daemon) package or
> > > just libvirt-client libraries?
> > >
> > > At the moment, I don't think I can install virt-manager on a management
> > > client machine without also installing the libvirt daemon due to this
> > > dependency - which feels wrong.
> >
> > Yeah that's bogus, we forgot to change the dep to libvirt-client
>
> So is the attached an acceptable patch (although I have not tested it)?
>
> It would be nice if virt-manager could be installed on F12 without
> requiring libvirt daemon and dependencies.
Yep, I've commited this patch.
Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list