On 07/21/2018 02:11 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 07/12/2018 03:37 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: >> The most important part is LIBVIRTD_PATH env var fix. It is used >> in virFileFindResourceFull() from tests. The libvirtd no longer >> lives under daemon/. >> >> Then, libvirtd-fail test was still failing (as expected) but not >> because of missing config file but because it was trying to >> execute (nonexistent) top_builddir/daemon/libvirtd which >> fulfilled expected outcome and thus test did not fail. >> >> Thirdly, lcov was told to generate coverage for daemon/ dir too. >> >> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Makefile.am | 2 +- >> run.in | 2 +- >> tests/libvirtd-fail | 4 ++-- >> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/Makefile.am b/Makefile.am >> index 1926e21b7a..709064c6a6 100644 >> --- a/Makefile.am >> +++ b/Makefile.am >> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ check-access: >> cov: clean-cov >> $(MKDIR_P) $(top_builddir)/coverage >> $(LCOV) -c -o $(top_builddir)/coverage/libvirt.info.tmp \ >> - -d $(top_builddir)/src -d $(top_builddir)/daemon \ >> + -d $(top_builddir)/src \ > > Since daemon is the former name and this appears to be a clean label > target for coverage, perhaps we should keep daemon just to clean up > "old" trees... > No. This is no a clean label. The rule says: in order to make target "cov" you need to make target "clean-cov" first as it is dependency. So I'm changing the create target not the cleanup. And -d $dir to lcov means "include directory $dir to search for .da files" (whatever they are - doesn't matter now). Michal -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
