On Mon, 16 Jul 2018 09:54:12 +0200 Thomas Huth <thuth@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 16.07.2018 09:32, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > Libvirt developers would like to be copied on patches to qemu-doc > > appendix "Deprecated features". Do them the favor. > > > > Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > MAINTAINERS | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS > > index 20eef3cb61..666e936812 100644 > > --- a/MAINTAINERS > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > @@ -2194,6 +2194,10 @@ M: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> > > S: Odd Fixes > > F: docs/devel/build-system.txt > > > > +Incompatible changes > > +R: libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > +F: qemu-deprecated.texi > > Should we have a maintainer for the file, too? (I guess not, because > deprecation patches should go through the specific subsystems...) I don't think adding a maintainer makes sense for this file. > And what about a "S:" line? I don't think that makes too much sense, either. If anything, qemu-deprecated.texi should be in a category 'maintained by everybody', i.e. qemu-devel. Just like qemu-doc.texi, which does not have an entry in MAINTAINERS at all. -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
