On 12.07.2018 08:32, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: [...] >> For libvirt, I think whenever something is proposed for deprecation >> we could just CC libvir-list, or ask one of the libvirt people to >> confirm its not being used. If it is, then we should file BZ against >> libvirt. > > Makes sense, but relying on developers getting their cc: right every > time is a setting us up for failure. > > Our tool to help with getting cc: wrong less often is the MAINTAINERS > file. Could one of the libvirt developers watch changes to qemu-doc > appendix "Deprecated features"? Would putting the appendix in its own > .texi help with that? Sound like a good idea to put the appendix in its own texi file. Then add an "R: libvir-list" entry for that file to MAINTAINERS and we should be fine (at least for the people who use the get_maintainers.pl script). Thomas -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
