On Wed, Jul 04, 2018 at 01:21:44PM +0200, Boris Fiuczynski wrote:
Add support and tests for vhost-vsock-ccw. Signed-off-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 15 +++++++-- src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c | 7 +++- .../vhost-vsock-ccw-auto.args | 27 ++++++++++++++++ .../qemuxml2argvdata/vhost-vsock-ccw-auto.xml | 25 +++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2argvdata/vhost-vsock-ccw.args | 27 ++++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2argvdata/vhost-vsock-ccw.xml | 32 +++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c | 4 +++ .../vhost-vsock-ccw-auto.xml | 32 +++++++++++++++++++ tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/vhost-vsock-ccw.xml | 1 + tests/qemuxml2xmltest.c | 5 +++ 10 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/vhost-vsock-ccw-auto.args create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/vhost-vsock-ccw-auto.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/vhost-vsock-ccw.args create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2argvdata/vhost-vsock-ccw.xml create mode 100644 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/vhost-vsock-ccw-auto.xml create mode 120000 tests/qemuxml2xmloutdata/vhost-vsock-ccw.xml diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c index 04c5c28438..ab6944f68e 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c @@ -10089,10 +10089,21 @@ qemuBuildVsockDevStr(virDomainDefPtr def, { qemuDomainVsockPrivatePtr priv = (qemuDomainVsockPrivatePtr)vsock->privateData; virBuffer buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER; - const char *device = "vhost-vsock-pci"; char *ret = NULL; + const char *devsuffix; - virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "%s", device); + if (vsock->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_PCI) { + devsuffix = "pci"; + } else if (vsock->info.type == VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_ADDRESS_TYPE_CCW) { + devsuffix = "ccw"; + } else {
+ virReportError(VIR_ERR_CONFIG_UNSUPPORTED, + _("unsupported address type %s for vsock device"), + virDomainDeviceAddressTypeToString(vsock->info.type)); + goto cleanup; + }
This check belongs in qemuDomainDeviceDefValidateVsock
+ + virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "vhost-vsock-%s", devsuffix);
Having the whole device name in one string would be nicer than dealing with the device suffix, e.g.: if (type == _CCW) device = "vhost-vsock-ccw" else device = "vhost-vsock-pci" (or even virBufferAddLit, without the temporary variable - I forgot what led me to use it)
virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",id=%s", vsock->info.alias); virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",guest-cid=%u", vsock->guest_cid); virBufferAsprintf(&buf, ",vhostfd=%s%u", fdprefix, priv->vhostfd); diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c index eb11a660d7..9639595175 100644 --- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c @@ -306,7 +306,8 @@ qemuDomainPrimeVirtioDeviceAddresses(virDomainDefPtr def, declare address-less virtio devices to be of address type 'type' disks, networks, videos, consoles, controllers, memballoon and rng in this order - if type is ccw filesystem devices are declared to be of address type ccw + if type is ccw filesystem and vsock devices are declared to be of + address type ccw */
This whole comment is pointless - it's repeating what the function does, not why.
size_t i;
[...]
+ <devices> + <emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-system-s390x</emulator> + <disk type='block' device='disk'> + <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> + <source dev='/dev/HostVG/QEMUGuest1'/> + <target dev='hda' bus='virtio'/> + <address type='ccw' cssid='0xfe' ssid='0x0' devno='0x0000'/> + </disk> + <memballoon model='virtio'> + <address type='ccw' cssid='0xfe' ssid='0x0' devno='0x0001'/> + </memballoon> + <panic model='s390'/> + <vsock model='virtio'> + <cid auto='no' address='4'/> + <address type='ccw' cssid='0xfe' ssid='0x0' devno='0x0003'/> + </vsock> + </devices> +</domain> diff --git a/tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c b/tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c index d6911f9344..60bd9585e5 100644 --- a/tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c +++ b/tests/qemuxml2argvtest.c @@ -2914,6 +2914,10 @@ mymain(void) DO_TEST_CAPS_LATEST("vhost-vsock"); DO_TEST_CAPS_LATEST("vhost-vsock-auto"); + DO_TEST("vhost-vsock-ccw", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VHOST_VSOCK, + QEMU_CAPS_CCW, QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_S390); + DO_TEST("vhost-vsock-ccw-auto", QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_VHOST_VSOCK, + QEMU_CAPS_CCW, QEMU_CAPS_VIRTIO_S390);
It would be nice to extend the LATEST caps coverage to s390 as well, to make sure that adding a new capability won't affect the vsock device. Jano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list