On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 03:34:37PM +0200, Erik Skultety wrote: > See the RFC here: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-May/msg02218.html > > Since RFC: > - split graphics 'gl' to a standalone structure since it's now SPICE, SDL, > *and* VNC that will support it > > - egl-headless support for VNC, since VNC doesn't support OpenGL natively like > SPICE does > > - added a new attribute 'native' for spice which will instruct libvirt to use > '-display egl-headless' instead of libvirt trying to figure this on out by > itself, since egl-headless might have other uses besides mdev with VNC Can you elaborate on this part, as it feels a bit odd to me. Currently -display accepts vnc or spice or sdl or gtk or none Each of these -display options corresponds to a different <graphics type=XXX/> element in libvirt XML, except 'none' which corresponds to no <graphics> at all. We already allow multiple <graphics> elements to turn on say both SPICE and VNC at once. So why would we want to treat egl-headless differently as an attribute under the SPICE graphics, as opposed to just having <graphics type=egl-headless> as a thing in its own right. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
