ping^2? No other opinions? Tks, John On 06/20/2018 07:14 PM, John Ferlan wrote: > > > On 06/12/2018 10:32 AM, John Ferlan wrote: >> v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-June/msg00465.html >> >> The first patch is essentially a repeat of the v1 patch, but with >> a more correct commit message. During testing if the same address >> was supplied for the --config it wasn't checked. >> >> The second patch rearranges qemuDomainAttachDeviceLiveAndConfig to >> perform CONFIG and LIVE actions separately since the generated >> @devConf or @devLive could be different depending on whether the >> incoming XML has an <address> or not and whether the corresponding >> domain parse and post parse algorithms need to generate some sort >> of address for the device. >> >> >> John Ferlan (2): >> qemu: Check for existing hostdev address for cold attach device >> qemu: Use the correct vm def on cold attach >> >> src/qemu/qemu_driver.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------- >> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) >> > > ping? > > Can we come to a consensus either way on this? There's 2 that feel > fixing the underlying problem is worth it (myself and Laine) and 1 that > would not bother fixing the bug (Jano). > > Tks - > > John > > -- > libvir-list mailing list > libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
