On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 06:33:51PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 18 June 2018 at 18:18, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 02:14:31PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > >> > Sure if someone does that, we'll have no choice, but as long as 'pc' is > >> > shipped we shouldn't gratuitously break apps by changing the default. > >> > >> Right. I just want to make sure "omitting the machine-type may > >> stop working in the future" is documented somehow. > > > > I still think we should just add links to the qemu binary and > > use ARGV to detect the machine type. > > > > qemu-pc-i386 > > qemu-q35-x86_64 > > Do you really want 60 different qemu-something-arm symlinks? Absolutely not ! Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
