On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 08:18:16PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 02:14:31PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote: > > > Sure if someone does that, we'll have no choice, but as long as 'pc' is > > > shipped we shouldn't gratuitously break apps by changing the default. > > > > Right. I just want to make sure "omitting the machine-type may > > stop working in the future" is documented somehow. > > I still think we should just add links to the qemu binary and > use ARGV to detect the machine type. > > qemu-pc-i386 > qemu-q35-x86_64 Why having separate QEMU binaries would help? We still need to define and document what will happen when both the machine-type and the QEMU binary are omitted in the domain XML. Personally I prefer to document this as "we recommend you always specify the machine-type" instead of "we recommend you always specify the QEMU binary path". -- Eduardo -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
