Charles Duffy wrote: > Chris Lalancette wrote: >> No, you are right. This was part of the refactoring, and I just didn't re-read >> the code. I would prefer to move prog to the top of the block myself, and add >> args there; it just seems tidier. >> > > I agree that it's tidier -- but looking at things in context, I'm not > very comfortable putting the declarations at the very top of the > function. Part of the reason is that everything else there is > initialized, even if only to NULL; I hate to break such a convention, > but at the same time, I find it dangerous to suppress any warnings the > compiler might otherwise be able to generate should a codepath allow a > variable be used uninitialized. > > Does the below (creating a new code block and declaring both variables > there) work for everyone? > ACK -- Chris Lalancette -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list