On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 17:11:55 -0300, Julio Faracco wrote: > Since virConfGetValueBool() can return earlier, the parameter 'value' > might be not initialised properly inside this method. Another proof: Yeah, the problem is that if the value is not found, virConfGetValueBool returns 0 which I did not notice. I think a better fix will be to execute the condition checking 'tmp' only when virConfGetValueBool returns 1 as we care only if the user set the unsupported configuration.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
