Re: [tck PATCH 03/12] rpm: add some missing dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 11:07:13AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote:
> On 06/08/2018 09:45 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  perl-Sys-Virt-TCK.spec.PL | 15 ++++++++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK.spec.PL b/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK.spec.PL
> > index 39cc72f..c92fa34 100644
> > --- a/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK.spec.PL
> > +++ b/perl-Sys-Virt-TCK.spec.PL
> > @@ -35,8 +35,12 @@ Group: Development/Tools
> >  Source: http://libvirt.org/sources/tck/%{appname}-v%{version}.tar.gz
> >  Url: http://libvirt.org/
> >  BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{appname}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
> > -Requires: perl >= %{perl_version}
> > -Requires: libvirt >= 0.6.2
> > +Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version))
> > +Requires: libvirt >= 4.4.0
> 
> Are you sure it requires such a high libvirt version? This will make it
> more cumbersome for downstream maintainers to test their builds of older
> libvirt versions. Of course if there really is stuff that reliably fails
> with older libvirt versions, then they would need to make a downstream
> version of the tck that disables the failing tests anyway, but this
> makes that mandatory from the get-go.

To be honest I didn't check how broken older libvirt's are, but given
the fun with had with nwfilter, I suspect most are broken to some
degree or other. In fact even 4.4.0 is broken with nwfilter as my
two patches missed the release.

> Still something I can live with though.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxx>

> > @@ -57,9 +61,12 @@ BuildRequires: perl(TAP::Harness::Archive)
> >  BuildRequires: perl(Test::Builder)
> >  BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
> >  BuildRequires: perl(Sub::Uplevel)
> > -BuildRequires: perl(Sys::Virt) >= 0.2.0
> > +BuildRequires: perl(Sys::Virt) >= 0.2.1
> 
> What was this you were saying on IRC about 0.x version numbers? :-)

This was just syned from further down.

I do still need to figure out just which APIs from newer libvirt
we require.

> 
> >  BuildRequires: perl(XML::Twig)
> >  BuildRequires: perl(XML::Writer)
> > +BuildRequires: perl(XML::XPath)
> > +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod)
> > +BuildRequires: perl(Test::Pod::Coverage)
> >  # RPM autoprovides misses these 3
> >  Requires: perl(Test::Exception)
> >  Requires: perl(TAP::Formatter::HTML)
> > @@ -69,6 +76,8 @@ Requires: perl(Net::OpenSSH)
> >  Requires: perl(IO::Pty)
> >  Requires: libguestfs-tools
> >  Requires: /usr/bin/mkisofs
> > +# Want to force this minimal version, so don't rely on RPM autoprov
> > +Requires: perl(Sys::Virt) >= 0.2.1
> >  BuildArchitectures: noarch
> >  
> >  %description
> 
> 

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux