On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 10:59:58AM -0400, Laine Stump wrote: > My own machine has a virtual network on 192.168.123.0/24, and I've > been told that it's a common selection for people who create a second > network after libvirt's default (and in the past was used as a manual > alternative for the default network itself when 192.168.122.0/24 Heh, me too in fact :-) > casued a conflict). Changing to 192.168.97.0/24 also isn't foolproof, > but it's much less likely to encounter a conflict leading to a failed > test. > > Signed-off-by: Laine Stump <laine@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > scripts/networks/networkxml2hostout/tck-testnet-3.dat | 4 ++-- > scripts/networks/networkxml2hostout/tck-testnet-3.post.dat | 4 ++-- > scripts/networks/networkxml2xmlin/tck-testnet-3.xml | 2 +- > 3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
