On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 01:38:47PM +0200, Peter Krempa wrote: > On Thu, Jun 07, 2018 at 12:20:16 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > I don't know whether or not we decided this was a bug, but > > I have filed one anyway: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1588447 > > Your XML does not conform to the libvirt domain XML schema which always > called for an absolute path as we do with all paths in the domain XML: > > <group> > <attribute name="transport"> > <value>unix</value> > </attribute> > <attribute name="socket"> > <ref name="absFilePath"/> > </attribute> > </group> > > > We just did not validate this particular code path in the parser itself > (when the domain schema validation is not used). Sure. Libvirt does need to validate the paths because it's possible that the *wrong* path will be opened if a relative path is used, eg. if a socket with the same name happens to exist in "/" (or whatever is the working directory that libvirt changes to). Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com virt-df lists disk usage of guests without needing to install any software inside the virtual machine. Supports Linux and Windows. http://people.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-df/ -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
