On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 13:17:46 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 06/05/2018 11:43 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 10:45:55AM +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >> We are building with GnuTLS everywhere because GnuTLS is widely > >> available. In addition after recent patches Libvirt relies on > >> GnuTLS' PRNG. > > > > This second sentance isn't true AFAIK - we still have fallback > > to /dev/urandom - GNUTLS is merely the first choice. > > Okay. But after Peter's patches we do rely on GnuTLS more than ever ;-) > I'll reword and resend though. Not really. I just consolidated some code paths so now we actually check that gnutls is present for disks with secret. It would hit the error in a different place otherwise, this just broke the testsuite. A naive fix would be to disable those tests when gnutls is not present, but if we are going to make it always present it seems a waste of effort.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
