On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 02:24:28PM +0200, Xiao Feng Ren wrote:
From: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> This patch introduces a new attribute PCI address extension flag to deal with the extension PCI attributes such as 'uid' and 'fid' on the S390 platform. Signed-off-by: Yi Min Zhao <zyimin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- src/conf/device_conf.h | 1 + src/conf/domain_addr.h | 5 ++ src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c | 137 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
index b7c82cb6f1..adce399be6 100644
--- a/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
+++ b/src/qemu/qemu_domain_address.c
@@ -502,6 +502,60 @@ qemuDomainAssignARMVirtioMMIOAddresses(virDomainDefPtr def,
}
+static bool
+qemuDomainDeviceSupportZPCI(virQEMUCapsPtr qemuCaps,
+ virDomainDeviceDefPtr device)
+{
+ if (!virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_ZPCI))
+ return false;
There's no need to propagate qemuCaps all the way here, if we don't have QEMU_CAPS_DEVICE_ZPCI, we don't care which devices support it.
+
+ switch ((virDomainDeviceType) device->type) {
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CONTROLLER:
+ case VIR_DOMAIN_DEVICE_CHR:
+ return false;
Are these going to support it later? How will we detect that? Jano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
