On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 02:08:58PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Ján Tomko <jtomko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 11:00:27PM +0200, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:From: Fabiano Fidêncio <fidencio@xxxxxxxxxx> There are still some places using virConfGetValue() and then checking the specific type of the pointers and so on. Those place are not going to be changed as: - Directly using virConfGetValue*() would trigger virReportError() on their current codeIs that a problem in xenParseCPUFeatures?It would, at least, generate one more log, which would be misleading whoever ends up debugging some issue on that codepath later on.
I don't see it. xenConfigGetULong already reports an error when the "maxvcpus" value is malformed. Jano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list