Re: Call to virDomainIsActive hangs forever

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

thanks for your answer Daniel.

I think the best way to get more information about this bug is to reproduce it
with libvirt master branch.

However, i'm facing an issue when i try to run my own daemon: there is
a chid process
which is failing in a loop.

I used sudo strace -f ./libvirtd to watch all child processes, and
this is the output:
https://gist.github.com/Wenzel/620327a9b3b7e13454108c2e472eaa77

One of them is continously failing, and i don't clearly understand why.

Does this log file can help you identify the cause maybe ?
I'm here to provide more information if needed.


Thank you !

2018-03-27 16:12 GMT+03:00 Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 04:04:33PM +0300, Mathieu Tarral wrote:
>> > Are you sure this isa  different thread ? It looks identical to the first
>> > stack trace you give above.
>>
>> Yes, the first one is calling libvirtmod.virDomainGetState
>> and the second one libvirtmod.virDomainIsActive.
>>
>> > Interesting. This is an identical stack trace - so we have 2 python
>> > threads both calling virDomainIsActive(). Nothing wrong with that
>> > per-se - we support multithreaded usage like this.
>>
>> virDomainGetState()
>> and
>> virDomainIsActive()
>
> Opps, yes i see.
>
>> > Can you confirm there are no other threads running libvirt code
>> > in your python app ?  Did you have any thread running the libvirt
>> > event loop perhaps ?
>>
>> Actually i found 2 others threads in Python app calling libvirt.
>>
>> So, as a recap:
>
>
>>
>> (gdb) bt
>> #0  pthread_sigmask (how=how@entry=0, newmask=<optimized out>,
>> newmask@entry=0x7f4ffd7f8d10, oldmask=oldmask@entry=0x7f4ffd7f8c90) at
>> ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pthread_sigmask.c:50
>
> This is slightly unusual - pthread_sigmask() should complete in a tiny
> fraction of a second, so seeing it in the stack trace is odd unless you
> have very fortuitous timing when taking the stack trace.
>
>> #1  0x00007f508e0f52fa in virNetClientIOEventLoop
>> (client=client@entry=0x55a1fde4d2b0,
>> thiscall=thiscall@entry=0x7f4fe005a350) at
>> ../../../src/rpc/virnetclient.c:1659
>> #2  0x00007f508e0f5a16 in virNetClientIO (thiscall=0x7f4fe005a350,
>> client=0x55a1fde4d2b0) at ../../../src/rpc/virnetclient.c:1944
>> #3  virNetClientSendInternal (client=client@entry=0x55a1fde4d2b0,
>> msg=msg@entry=0x7f4fe0031f50, expectReply=expectReply@entry=true,
>> nonBlock=nonBlock@entry=false) at ../../../src/rpc/virnetclient.c:2116
>> #4  0x00007f508e0f7443 in virNetClientSendWithReply
>> (client=client@entry=0x55a1fde4d2b0, msg=msg@entry=0x7f4fe0031f50) at
>> ../../../src/rpc/virnetclient.c:2144
>> #5  0x00007f508e0f7bf2 in virNetClientProgramCall
>> (prog=prog@entry=0x55a1fdff0f90, client=client@entry=0x55a1fde4d2b0,
>> serial=serial@entry=105, proc=proc@entry=14, noutfds=noutfds@entry=0,
>> outfds=outfds@entry=0x0, ninfds=0x0,
>>     infds=0x0, args_filter=0x7f508e0ecba0
>> <xdr_remote_domain_get_xml_desc_args>, args=0x7f4ffd7f8fe0,
>> ret_filter=0x7f508e0ecbd0 <xdr_remote_domain_get_xml_desc_ret>,
>> ret=0x7f4ffd7f8fd8)
>>     at ../../../src/rpc/virnetclientprogram.c:329
>> #6  0x00007f508e0cdeb4 in callFull (priv=priv@entry=0x55a1fe5ac460,
>> flags=flags@entry=0, fdin=fdin@entry=0x0, fdinlen=fdinlen@entry=0,
>> fdout=fdout@entry=0x0, fdoutlen=fdoutlen@entry=0x0, proc_nr=14,
>>     args_filter=0x7f508e0ecba0 <xdr_remote_domain_get_xml_desc_args>,
>> args=0x7f4ffd7f8fe0 "`k.\376\241U", ret_filter=0x7f508e0ecbd0
>> <xdr_remote_domain_get_xml_desc_ret>, ret=0x7f4ffd7f8fd8 "",
>> conn=<optimized out>)
>>     at ../../../src/remote/remote_driver.c:6636
>> #7  0x00007f508e0d7b58 in call (conn=<optimized out>,
>> ret=0x7f4ffd7f8fd8 "", ret_filter=<optimized out>, args=0x7f4ffd7f8fe0
>> "`k.\376\241U", args_filter=<optimized out>, proc_nr=14, flags=0,
>> priv=0x55a1fe5ac460)
>>     at ../../../src/remote/remote_driver.c:6658
>> #8  remoteDomainGetXMLDesc (dom=<optimized out>, flags=0) at
>> ../../../src/remote/remote_client_bodies.h:2698
>> #9  0x00007f508e08f5c1 in virDomainGetXMLDesc
>> (domain=domain@entry=0x55a1fe212da0, flags=0) at
>> ../../../src/libvirt-domain.c:2592
>> #10 0x00007f508e46c8c0 in libvirt_virDomainGetXMLDesc (self=<optimized
>> out>, args=<optimized out>) at build/libvirt.c:1212
>> #11 0x000055a1fb4cb6df in PyCFunction_Call () at ../Objects/methodobject.c:109
>
>
> Aside from the thing mentioned above I don't see any reason why you would
> have bad problems here.
>
> I don't have much more useful to suggest, other than to try using the very
> latest libvirt to see if you get the same behaviour. If not, then it would
> point to a bug in old libvirt, but I don't recall anything that would cause
> this behaviour you see offhand.
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
> --
> |: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
> |: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
> |: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|



-- 
Mathieu Tarral

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list




[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]

  Powered by Linux