On Thu, 19 Apr 2018 10:09:30 +0200 Laszlo Ersek <lersek@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/19/18 02:09, David Gibson wrote: > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > [...] > > Thank you -- I will replace SLOF with "openfirmware". > > This also implies I shouldn't add "openbios" separately, which was > suggested earlier by Gerd -- according to > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenBIOS>, OpenBIOS is another > implementation of OFW. Right. Although I think OpenBIOS and SLOF support a disjoint set of machines. Openhackware which is (was?) used on some machines is yet another (very partial) openfirmware implementation. > > [...] > > Right, this is about interfaces, so I'll keep "uboot". Ok. More specifically I guess this is about firmware <-> guest OS, and firmware <-> interactive user interfaces. Firmware <-> qemu interfaces (fw_cfg, device tree) are a different question. -- David Gibson <dgibson@xxxxxxxxxx> Principal Software Engineer, Virtualization, Red Hat
Attachment:
pgpAWafsONWiS.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
