ping? Beyond patch 1 which was reviewed. These are not uml specific, but rather more how domain objects are handled Tks - John On 04/02/2018 09:06 AM, John Ferlan wrote: > Patches 9-11 of larger series: > v1: https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00489.html > > Changes since v1: > > * Patches 1 and 2 new - essentially they fix issues with how > virDomainObjListRemove was used inconsistently. > > * Patch 3 should be the same or very similar to the former patch 9: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00498.html > > * Patch 4 should be the same as former patch 10: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2018-March/msg00499.html > > * Patch 5 is altered to also fix virDomainObjListRemove inconsistencies > > John Ferlan (5): > uml: Fix umlProcessAutoDestroyDom dom processing > uml: Fix umlInotifyEvent dom object handling > uml: Create accessors to virDomainObjListFindByUUID > uml: Add more specific error message on failed FindBy call > uml: Use virDomainObjListFindBy{UUID|ID}Ref > > src/uml/uml_driver.c | 353 +++++++++++++++++---------------------------------- > 1 file changed, 116 insertions(+), 237 deletions(-) > -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
