On 04/17/2018 02:20 PM, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 02:00:25PM -0600, Jim Fehlig wrote:Your response in the V6 thread about "conflicting types (with libxl_get_free_memory_0x040700)" was a good hint. Things work fine for me on Xen 4.4 through 4.10 with the following squashed in diff --git a/tests/Makefile.am b/tests/Makefile.am index 2c0d1311c..8c4b6c220 100644 --- a/tests/Makefile.am +++ b/tests/Makefile.am @@ -528,6 +528,7 @@ libxlxml2domconfigtest_LDADD = $(libxl_LDADDS) $(LIBXML_LIBS) virmocklibxl_la_SOURCES = \ virmocklibxl.c +virmocklibxl_la_CFLAGS = $(LIBXL_CFLAGS) virmocklibxl_la_LDFLAGS = $(MOCKLIBS_LDFLAGS) virmocklibxl_la_LIBADD = $(MOCKLIBS_LIBS) But I'm still confused as to how this works for you. Any idea about that? :-)Oh, I see it now. For me, -DLIBXL_API_VERSION=0x040400 landed in CFLAGS, not only LIBXL_CFLAGS. According to config.log it happened just after testing for xenlight - first, the test using pkg-config failed (something wrong with my libxl installation), but then fallback to manual check. And since then, every gcc call have -DLIBXL_API_VERSION=0x040400. Looking at m4/virt-driver-libxl.m4, I think it's because saved old_CFLAGS is overridden by LIBVIRT_CHECK_LIB with actual CFLAGS (now containing -DLIBXL_API_VERSION=0x040400).
Ah, looks to be the case. But that is existing and can be fixed in a followup IMO. So do you agree with the change to add LIBXL_CFLAGS to virmocklibxl_la_CFLAGS?
Regards, Jim -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
