On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:49:39 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > On 04/17/2018 10:05 AM, Peter Krempa wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 18:39:52 +0200, Michal Privoznik wrote: > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1480668 > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> src/qemu/qemu_command.c | 6 ++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > >> > >> diff --git a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c > >> index f864350bd5..67350719aa 100644 > >> --- a/src/qemu/qemu_command.c > >> +++ b/src/qemu/qemu_command.c > >> @@ -3148,6 +3148,12 @@ qemuBuildMemoryBackendStr(virJSONValuePtr *backendProps, > >> NULL) < 0) > >> goto cleanup; > >> > >> + if (virQEMUCapsGet(qemuCaps, QEMU_CAPS_OBJECT_MEMORY_FILE_DISCARD) && > >> + virJSONValueObjectAdd(props, > >> + "B:discard-data", true, > > > > This code path is used also for NVDIMMs, and since the documentaion for > > the option states that: > > > > The new option can be used to indicate that the file contents can > > be destroyed and don't need to be flushed to disk when QEMU exits > > or when the memory backend object is removed. > > > > I'm not sure whether this is right. > > > > Okay, I'll make it configurable via domain XML. However, I'm struggling > to come up with useful design. Perhaps we can have <discardData/> > element under <memoryBacking/>? > > <memoryBacking> > <discardData/> > </memoryBacking> > > and in order to be able to fine tune this per nvdimm/RAM modules we can > have: > > <memory model='nvdimm'> > <source ../> > <target ../> > <discardData/> > </memory> > > However, this would allow the element even for cases when > memory-backing-ram is used (or the old way of configuration without any > memory-backend-* at all). Well, I think you need to think more about how this is going to be used. I think that for NVDIMMs we should never use that option, but for normal memory dimms we should always use it. I don't really think that having it configurable would add any benefit. I just wanted to point out that for NVDIMMS which are supposed to be persistent we should not destroy the data.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list