Jim Meyering wrote: > Chris Lalancette wrote: >> Charles Duffy wrote: >>> Per prior discussion -- this was, indeed, trivial. >>> >>> I'm a little disappointed to be breaking the ordering characteristics of >>> the enum (as it had been ordered by increasing time requirements and >>> decreasing output size), but breaking any save files with the old >> Heh, that was completely an accident; I just added them as I implemented them. >> So no loss there. >> >> ACK to the patch. > > Hi Chris, > > FYI, in the context of that patch, I noticed compression support (nice!), > and LZMA support in particular, but none for xz, which is the successor > to lzma. <http://tukaani.org/xz/> > > Now that XZ's format is stable, and xz is in F11, you may > want to support it, too. > > Actually, since lzma is deprecated, and support for it in libvirt > went in only 3 weeks ago, you may want to remove it completely, > in favor of xz. Hey Jim, Right, I noticed that as I was developing this (and another patch). The situation between xz and lzma wasn't completely clear to me, so thanks for clarifying a little. The thing is, isn't the command-line tool for xz still called "lzma"? Or is the tool called "xz"? -- Chris Lalancette -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list