On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 09:22 +0200, Pavel Hrdina wrote: [...] > > diff --git a/guests/vars/projects/base.yml b/guests/vars/projects/base.yml > > index a0483d8..49d4d2e 100644 > > --- a/guests/vars/projects/base.yml > > +++ b/guests/vars/projects/base.yml > > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ packages: > > - automake > > - autopoint > > - bash > > + - bash-completion > > - ccache > > - chrony > > - cppi > > diff --git a/guests/vars/projects/libvirt.yml b/guests/vars/projects/libvirt.yml > > index 9f027f8..598dfc4 100644 > > --- a/guests/vars/projects/libvirt.yml > > +++ b/guests/vars/projects/libvirt.yml > > @@ -3,7 +3,6 @@ packages: > > - apparmor > > - augeas > > - avahi > > - - bash-completion > > I'm not sure about removing it from libvirt dependencies. I think we > should keep it in both places since it's an extension that improves > testing environment and also it's a dependency of libvirt. The whole point of 'base' is not having to list packages more than once: if someone wants to get the full list of dependencies for building a project, they're going to have to take both those specific to the project itself and those in base anyway, which is exactly what I do every time I sync the Travis CI configuration with the CentOS CI configuration. I don't see any reason to treat bash-completion differently. -- Andrea Bolognani / Red Hat / Virtualization -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
