On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 06:35:06PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > On Tuesday, 3 April 2018 18:28:46 CEST John Ferlan wrote: > > Could we add some sort of table where we could keep track of "known" and > > supported OS versions, what libvirt version was used, what QEMU version > > was used? > > Do you mean like what repology does? > https://repology.org/metapackage/qemu/versions > https://repology.org/metapackage/qemu-kvm/versions > https://repology.org/metapackage/libvirt/versions > > It does not list commercial distributions though, but surely the status > of RHEL is the same as CentOS. Ah yes, that's the site I was just looking for. We should just link to the relevant pages on that site rather than duplicating it. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
