On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 01:38:50PM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 11:12 +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 11:53:53AM +0100, Andrea Bolognani wrote:
> > > While RHEL / CentOS are still using Python 2 for the time being,
> > > Fedora has already switched to Python 3 as the default Python
> > > interpreter a while ago, so on that OS it doesn't make sense to
> > > drag in Python 2 anymore.
> >
> > While current RHEL are py2, future RHEL should be expected to
> > use Python 3 too
> >
> [...]
> > > +# Fedora can use Python 3, which unlike Python 2 is installed by default
> > > +%if 0%{?fedora}
> >
> > This should include "|| 0%{?rhel} > 7" too
>
> I think we should cross that bridge when we come to it, eg. when a
> RHEL release that uses Python 3 as the default Python is released.
>
> We're probably going to have to go through the spec file and
> reassess most package relationships at that point anyway.
We've already crossed the bridge & done this work
commit b2ab38bfdc765bbcb56b89b55dfee6b406fc8c29
Author: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Feb 9 14:08:45 2018 +0100
spec: Prepare for future RHEL
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
