----- "Daniel Veillard" <veillard@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 10:47:58PM +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> > +static virDrvOpenStatus
> > +remoteSecretOpen (virConnectPtr conn,
> > + virConnectAuthPtr auth,
> > + int flags)
> > +{
> > + if (inside_daemon)
> > + return VIR_DRV_OPEN_DECLINED;
> > +
> > + if (conn &&
> > + conn->driver &&
> > + STREQ (conn->driver->name, "remote")) {
> > + struct private_data *priv;
> > +
> > + /* If we're here, the remote driver is already
> > + * in use due to a) a QEMU uri, or b) a remote
> > + * URI. So we can re-use existing connection
> > + */
>
> Hum, is that comment right ? We are certainly using a remote URI in
> any case there, isn't it ?
The same comment is in in all of the other "subdriver" remote...Open () routines. It's not quite clear what "remote" means where, as far as I can see "remote" means an "explicitly remote" URL, e.g. anything+tls://hostname/..., and "QEMU" means "qemu://hostname/..." (rejected by qemu_driver).
Mirek
--
Libvir-list mailing list
Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list