On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 10:30:49AM +0100, Pavel Hrdina wrote: > We will require libvirt to have at least the same version as > libvirt-dbus. The 1.2.12 version is the lowest one which we will > support since it introduced virDomainDefineXMLFlags() and we don't > have to support the non-flags APIs. > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > configure.ac | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index df1a375..ba397ca 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ > -AC_INIT([libvirt-dbus], [0.0.1], [libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx], [], [http://libvirt.org]) > +AC_INIT([libvirt-dbus], [1.2.12], [libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx], [], [http://libvirt.org]) > > AC_CONFIG_SRCDIR(src/main.c) > AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR([build-aux]) > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS > > AM_SILENT_RULES([yes]) > > -LIBVIRT_REQUIRED=1.2.8 > +LIBVIRT_REQUIRED=AC_PACKAGE_VERSION This feels a bit odd to me - what will you set the AC_INIT version to if you want todo 5 releases of libvirt-dbus, without bumping the min required version of libvirt. I can understand having the libvirt-dbus versions be set in lockstep to libvirt versions in AC_INIT, if you plan to always do a libvirt-dbus release on the 1st of the month at same time as libvirt, but even then I doubt you'd want to set min required libvirt to match. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
