On 03/05/2018 04:36 AM, Michal Privoznik wrote: > When trying to destroy a domain (e.g. because we've seen EOF on > the monitor) we try to acquire QEMU_JOB_DESTROY. However, if > max_queued is set in qemu.conf this may fail and since our code > doesn't count on that we will still report domain as active even > though the qemu process is long gone. More specifically, if we've > seen EOF on the monitor, qemuProcessHandleMonitorEOF() is called > which sends MONITOR_EOF job to the event worker pool and > unregisters monitor from the event loop. The worker pool calls > processMonitorEOFEvent() which tries to set job which may fail > due to the limit as described above. > > Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > src/qemu/qemu_domain.c | 3 ++- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > Should the qemu.conf explanation be adjusted to specifically note that a DESTROY job does not count against the max queue jobs count? Reviewed-by: John Ferlan <jferlan@xxxxxxxxxx> John -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
