On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 04:35:54PM +0100, Erik Skultety wrote: > On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 11:00:06AM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Since you edited the template you referenced ^above, you added the whole thing > which I'm not sure is really necessary. There's also some leftover star object. Yeah, I was not 100% sure whether it was a good idea to trim all the extra layers off or not, but as you say, it does make a big template file. So minimising it makes sense. > I think that we can keep the SVG as small as possible (that's actually the > reason why I created mine from scratch) an only incorporate what we absolutely > need, like the shape itself and measurements, so that we can export it to PDF > (I've heard that printing services actually prefer PDF). Also, I noticed that > you "went by eye" with placing the logo, I've got patches to mitigate this, so > we should be then able to use proper alignment. Yeah, I did it by eye :-) Did you think it needs tweaking more ? > The spec doesn't specify the thickness of the border, I measure 4.17 here, I > received another template which also a few projects follow with the border > sized at 3.26 (not that I would care that much), the bleed area is the same > 1.5mm in both cases. Yeah, I just followed the border size that the template showed, but it does feel perhaps too heavy, even hiding the bleed. We could thin it out some more perhaps. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :| -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
