Gerrit Slomma wrote: > For me a kvm-85-devel would be a development-build prior to releasing > kvm-85. > If the kvm-85-devel would go public the *-devel annex had simply to be > removed. > But that is a philosophical argument. Right. I really don't actually care either way, we just need a way to distinguish which version of -devel we are actually looking at. -- Chris Lalancette -- Libvir-list mailing list Libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list