Re: [PATCH] AppArmor: Allow libvirtd to kill unconfined processes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,
On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 07:43:56AM +0100, intrigeri wrote:
> Christian Ehrhardt:
> > I recently had spotted this issue and discussed on IRC but couldn't
> > recreate after a while when I wanted to debug.
> 
> I've seen it the last few times I've started libvirtd.service on two
> different Debian sid ("unstable") systems.
> 
> > But the reason and the rule totally make sense.
> 
> > It is a bit unfortunate as it allows random kills essentially, so if
> > anyone is up to we might be better up to spawn those capability
> > probers with a named profile that we can refer to here.
> 
> Yes, this would be ideal. Sadly, this requires C programming skills so
> it's out of my league.
> 
> > But until then the rule here is required to not get into awkward situations.
> 
> > +1 from me, thanks intrigeri
> 
> Thanks :)

Pushed now.
 -- Guido

--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list



[Index of Archives]     [Virt Tools]     [Libvirt Users]     [Lib OS Info]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]
  Powered by Linux