On Friday, 12 January 2018 12:38:02 CET Bjoern Walk wrote: > Let's add a test case for S390 with CPU frequency information available. > Test data is sampled from an IBM z13 system running kernel 4.14 on LPAR. > > Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- LGTM, just a couple of notes that came into my mind when reading the existing sysinfodata for s390. > diff --git a/tests/sysinfodata/s390-freqcpuinfo.data b/tests/sysinfodata/s390-freqcpuinfo.data > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..0edc371d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/sysinfodata/s390-freqcpuinfo.data > [...] > +processor 0: version = 00, identification = 145F07, machine = 2964 > +processor 1: version = 00, identification = 145F07, machine = 2964 > +processor 2: version = 00, identification = 145F07, machine = 2964 > +processor 3: version = 00, identification = 145F07, machine = 2964 > +processor 4: version = 00, identification = 145F07, machine = 2964 > +processor 5: version = 00, identification = 145F07, machine = 2964 > +processor 6: version = 00, identification = 145F07, machine = 2964 > +processor 7: version = 00, identification = 145F07, machine = 2964 All the various "identification", and ... > diff --git a/tests/sysinfodata/s390-freqsysinfo.data b/tests/sysinfodata/s390-freqsysinfo.data > new file mode 100644 > index 00000000..1941ef0b > --- /dev/null > +++ b/tests/sysinfodata/s390-freqsysinfo.data > @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ > +Manufacturer: IBM > +Type: 2964 > +Model: 704 NC9 > +Sequence Code: 0000000000085F07 .. this value are replaced by what look like dummy values, so maybe the same should be done for this data too (in case they are sensitive information)? -- Pino Toscano
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
