On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 16:43:39 +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > Although we're capable of building against any libvirt >= 0.9.11, 99% of the > time we want RPM builds to be done against matching libvirt version, otherwise > we might silently build against an unexpected/wrong version. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > libvirt-python.spec.in | 2 +- > setup.py | 3 +-- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libvirt-python.spec.in b/libvirt-python.spec.in > index 0087c78..6afa6f8 100644 > --- a/libvirt-python.spec.in > +++ b/libvirt-python.spec.in > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Source0: http://libvirt.org/sources/python/%{name}-%{version}.tar.gz > Url: http://libvirt.org > License: LGPLv2+ > Group: Development/Libraries > -BuildRequires: libvirt-devel >= @C_VERSION@ > +BuildRequires: libvirt-devel >= %{version} Shouldn't we even restrict this to ==? If libvirt-python is built against newer version of libvirt, its generator may provide incorrect implementation for new APIs which need to be implemented manually. And only new enough libvirt-python will have these new APIs in the override list. Jirka -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list