On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 11:02 AM, Cedric Bosdonnat <cbosdonnat@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 17:55 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: >> [...] >> >> > > To me, 1 feels most correct cause while the other two fix hugepages, >> > > there seem to be lurking bugs since we aren't implementing >> > > domainSetPathLabel. >> > > >> > >> > I work on #1 a while and I think we can do a lot good here. >> > Yet while I'm convinced at the changes this is currently a debugging nightmare. >> > I guess it wants to become a 2018 submission. >> >> Note: I'll not user reply-to onto this thread to keep threading somewhat sane. >> Also the new submission, while inspired by this discussion, is a >> totally separate thing. >> >> > So for now keep this hugepage patch out of consideration when looking >> > at applying all those with many +1's. >> >> So as I expected the hugepage patch of this series will be covered by >> the new series that I submit. >> But I wanted to ask for all the others changes in the current series >> here to be considered - most have one or two acks already. >> Let me know if more is needed to commit them. > > This is the only patch from the series that I haven't pushed or ignored... > What should be done with this one? On this change here please do nothing - this is the one superseded by the new series that is in review since early january. Michael already had feedback there which I'm looking into shortly. Thank you so much for committing the acked patches of this series! -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
