When specifying a new CPU model in cpu_map.xml as an extension to an existing model, we forgot to copy the signature (family + model) from the original CPU model. We don't use this way of specifying CPU models, but it's still supported and it becomes useful when someone wants to quickly hack up a CPU model for testing or when creating additional variants of existing models to help with fixing some spectral issues. Signed-off-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@xxxxxxxxxx> --- src/cpu/cpu_x86.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c index 2a2f7cbf39..b2398c5ad2 100644 --- a/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c +++ b/src/cpu/cpu_x86.c @@ -1227,6 +1227,7 @@ x86ModelParse(xmlXPathContextPtr ctxt, VIR_FREE(name); model->vendor = ancestor->vendor; + model->signature = ancestor->signature; if (x86DataCopy(&model->data, &ancestor->data) < 0) goto error; } -- 2.15.1 -- libvir-list mailing list libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list