On 12/21/2017 09:29 AM, Marc Hartmayer wrote:
> ...as there is an access to priv->sasl the priv->lock is needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer <mhartmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Bjoern Walk <bwalk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> daemon/remote.c | 20 +++++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Both callers remoteDispatchAuthSaslStart and remoteDispatchAuthSaslStep
already have priv->lock taken (unless I'm missing something).
John
> diff --git a/daemon/remote.c b/daemon/remote.c
> index b6fe6d8539ff..81d570b6e269 100644
> --- a/daemon/remote.c
> +++ b/daemon/remote.c
> @@ -3389,6 +3389,9 @@ remoteSASLFinish(virNetServerPtr server,
> const char *identity;
> struct daemonClientPrivate *priv = virNetServerClientGetPrivateData(client);
> int ssf;
> + int rv = 0;
> +
> + virMutexLock(&priv->lock);
>
> /* TLS or UNIX domain sockets trivially OK */
> if (!virNetServerClientIsSecure(client)) {
> @@ -3398,15 +3401,15 @@ remoteSASLFinish(virNetServerPtr server,
> VIR_DEBUG("negotiated an SSF of %d", ssf);
> if (ssf < 56) { /* 56 is good for Kerberos */
> VIR_ERROR(_("negotiated SSF %d was not strong enough"), ssf);
> - return -2;
> + goto rejected;
> }
> }
>
> if (!(identity = virNetSASLSessionGetIdentity(priv->sasl)))
> - return -2;
> + goto rejected;
>
> if (!virNetSASLContextCheckIdentity(saslCtxt, identity))
> - return -2;
> + goto rejected;
>
> if (!(clnt_identity = virNetServerClientGetIdentity(client)))
> goto error;
> @@ -3425,10 +3428,17 @@ remoteSASLFinish(virNetServerPtr server,
> virObjectUnref(priv->sasl);
> priv->sasl = NULL;
>
> - return 0;
> + cleanup:
> + virMutexUnlock(&priv->lock);
> + return rv;
>
> error:
> - return -1;
> + rv = -1;
> + goto cleanup;
> +
> + rejected:
> + rv = -2;
> + goto cleanup;
> }
>
> /*
>
--
libvir-list mailing list
libvir-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/libvir-list
